Because there does not look like any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can several of you present a place to begin with this mixture and matters to consider when working this Load up?
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was creating more stress and was slower compared to the aged stuff. I do not recall if I even experimented with common h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Click on to broaden...
The truth that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing bigger velocities received with that powder, versus Everything you've viewed with the IMR stuff. Also excellent powder, but to some degree greater suited to a little bit smaller circumstances by using a little bit fewer potential.
Sweet!! I am going to decide on some up and provides it a check out. Thanks fellas, I take pleasure in it! I am going to Enable you to know what I discover. I do have about a half pound of 4350 I am able to check out that to start with and find out what transpires.
Novice to reloading. This is going to be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been capable to get my hands on a couple lbs . of h4831.
Because there does not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you present a place to begin with this mix and items to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
I am utilizing it having a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did properly but I was a bit worried about temp security. I believe I'm at seventy two grains and acquire about 2850ish fps
Like said h4831sc load data above, same things. Everything differs is the scale with the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I don't know if that is definitely real or not but would sound right to me. I use SC because that is what I located in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.
[email shielded] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I have killed extra Deer using this combo h4831 vs h4831sc than each of the rifles I personal put together, Operate around this but the sweet place will probably be around fifty four, I'm a Two Little bit-06 nut and I have some things tat functions rather well h4831 vs h4831sc for me Should your fascinated
Kansas City, MO I'd get whatsoever is out there at this time. I’ve utilised both equally nevertheless with my head to load and didn’t see everything unique general performance intelligent.
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group nowadays. It's somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots good. Thanks for the advice, It really is excellent to are aware that I have got alternatives when one particular or one other powder is dried up.
Can I believe that H4831 might be substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the Bodily change but will it have an effect on the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I am not 100% positive.
I sawed one particular in 50 percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, they usually were simply two times as thick like a fifty-grain hollow level was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Power Issue, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I understand about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know everything whatsoever about the 223. I question that you are going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.